English Translation of Equador and Assange’s Living Protocol Agreement


English Translation of Equador and Assange’s Living Protocol Agreement


EMBASSY OF ECUADOR IN GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND


SPECIAL PROTOCOL OF VISITS, COMMUNICATIONS 

AND MEDICAL ATTENTION TO THE LORD JULIAN PAUL ASSANGE


Within the framework of the international diplomatic asylum instruments of which the Republic of Ecuador is a State Party, in order to guarantee the exercise of the fundamental rights of Mr. Julian Paul Assange while Ecuador recognizes him as a diplomatic asylum and to ensure the security of the officials and facilities of the Embassy of Ecuador in London, the Embassy and the asylee will follow the procedures established in this Special Protocol, the presentation of which was announced by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ecuador in the communication addressed to Mr. Julian Assange and its Legal Attorney’s August 24, 2018.


The provisions of this Special Protocol must be strictly complied with by the asylee and, as appropriate, by the Embassy of Ecuador, and have the purpose of facilitating the reception of visits in an orderly and safe manner, communicating with the outside of the Embassy. and the periodic medical care that Ecuador requires him to undergo and/or the asylee requires.


A. VISITS


1.        Everyone outside the Embassy or the Ecuadorian Government, without exception, want to see Mr. Julian Assange, must request permission in writing to the Head of the Embassy of Ecuador in London, to the following address: eecugranbretania @ ajcancilleria.gob.ec


2.        The visit request must be sent to the Embassy, the aforementioned email, with an anticipation of at least 3 business except days concerned a medical visit. In said visit request it will be indicated:


a)       First and last names of the applicant;


b)       Type and number of identity document, country of issuance and nationality of the applicant. A copy of the document, in digital format, will be attached as an annex ;


e) Reason (s) for the visit, and indication if done personally or on behalf of another person, natural or legal;


d)      Applicant profession, employer and address workplace;


e)       Email and social network addresses of the applicant;


f) Brand, model, serial number, IMEI number and telephone number (if applicable) of each of the telephone sets, tablets, computers, cameras and other electronic equipment that the applicant wants to enter the Embassy and keep with them during their interview with the asylee. (If the visitor does not want to keep equipment with them during his interview with the asylee, he will not declare them in the visit request but he must leave any equipment such as the ones mentioned in the entrance door of the Embassy: The equipment will be returned at the exit to their owners);


g)       Suggested date and time for the visit to Mr. Assange; Y,


h)      Approximate duration of the visit.


3.        In the event that a person wishes to visit the asylee frequently, or that the asylee wants to be visited frequently by a person (who will be called for the purposes of this Special Protocol “Frequent Visitor”), the Embassy and Mr. Julian Assange will agree on the periodicity of those visits. A “Frequent Visitor” will be required to declare only on the first visit the information contained in section 1 of this Special Protocol. After the second visit and on each subsequent occasion that arrives at the Embassy, you must only present the Identification Card indicated below, along with the information contained in the letters (f), at the entrance to the Embassy. , (g) and (h) of section 2 of this Special Protocol.


4.        The Embassy will issue to each “Frequent Visitor” an Identification Letter that will include your photograph, the information required in (a) and (b) of section 2 and a date of validity of the Charter, which will last for 3 months. from your expedition. The Identification Letter may be renewed through a request in which the requirements of section 2 of this Special Protocol are completed again. The Security Staff of the Embassy will request, in each of the income of a “Frequent Visitor”, that the visitor declare the information contained in 2 (f) or leave the equipment consigned to the entrance of the Embassy.


5.        The approval of a visit request will be communicated to the applicants by email only. Applicants will be admitted to the Embassy of Ecuador in London only when they have received such approval via email, which will have the approval of the Head of the Embassy and the consent of Mr. Julian Assange. In order to be admitted, all visitors must hand over to the security personnel of the Diplomatic Mission a hard copy of the email approving the visit and leave a personal identity document at the entrance.


6        The Embassy will not give explanations of the reasons why an application for a visit has been accepted or denied. The Embassy reserves the right to cancel at any time an authorization to visit Mr. Julian Assange as well as to cancel an Identification Letter and authorization to enter a Frequent Visitor.


7        In the case of Mr. Julian Assange wants to receive a person visiting within the premises of the Embassy, the visitor will be requested to comply with the same requirements set out in Section 2 of this Special Protocol. SE You will understand that Mr. Assange has given his consent to the visit because he requested it.


8     If a person presents himself at the Embassy without a prior appointment, he may only enter if the Chief of the Embassy grants a written authorization and. Mr. Assange gives his consent to the admission. The person in question will only be able to enter the Embassy after filling out the form that will be delivered to him at the entrance door, with the information included in section 2 of this Special Protocol, and present a copy of his passport or identity card to the Embassy. of identity (in case of being Ecuadorian).


9.     No person, without exception, may enter the Embassy to visit Mr. Julian Assange if it has not been properly identified in the manner described in the preceding paragraphs. All visitors entering the Embassy’s headquarters must go through the control and security filters of the Diplomatic Mission. and leave with the Security Staff an identification document that will be returned upon departure. The visitor refuses to go through these filters or leave the identification. You can not enter the embassy.


10 Embassy shall maintain a written record of the visits to Mr. Assange, which shall include the information required marked visitors in this Special Protocol annexed incorporating requests for visits and identity documents presented. The original of the registry and its annexes will be kept in the archives of the Embassy. The Head of the Mission will send to the Ecuadorian Chancellery and to the public entities that will instruct him to send the Foreign Ministry, a copy of all the data of visits entered during each month, the first working day of the following month, via Quipux.eleven. The visits will only be given during working hours of the Embassy of Ecuador in London. Visits outside working hours, on weekends and holidays, will be made only if Mr. Julian Assange’s required, with a justification for that purpose and with the consent of the Chief of the Embassy of Ecuador, who shall provide that an official Embassy or security is present to receive the visitor and record their data. A copy of the application approved by the Head of the Embassy or his delegate must be delivered to the security personnel of the Diplomatic Mission for the respective registration.


12 In view of space and for security reasons, they can only enter the embassy to visit Mr. Assange up to three people at a time. Only the Chief of the Embassy may authorize the entry of a greater number of persons at the same time to be with Mr. Assange, in consideration of the reasons that exist for it and provided that the security of the Embassy and of the Embassy is not put at risk. asylee


13 By default the visitation established in this Special Protocol by Mr. Julian Assange, it is understood that if Mr. Assange rejects the conditions of the asylum and, in addition, it will be considered as a serious break of his obligations as an asylee to prevent the Republic of Ecuador from offering him the protection and security due. what may be causal for the termination of diplomatic asylum in accordance with current regulations.


14    Mr. Julian Assange and his visitors will observe a mandatory, respectful and courteous manner in dealing with the officials of the Embassy of Ecuador in London. Mr. Assange visitors not adequately behave in a visit to the asylee may not again enter the diplomatic mission.


15.    Persons from outside the Embassy of Ecuador who violate the visiting conditions established in this Special Protocol – whether they are visiting applicants, ordinary visitors, Frequent Visitors or persons not admitted by the Diplomatic Mission due to their lack of proper behavior during a visit to the Asylum – will be reported to the British authorities that provide security service to diplomatic missions accredited in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, for affecting the security of the Embassy of Ecuador and its officials.


B. COMMUNICATIONS


16    Mr. Julian Assange will have access to the internet by connecting to the Wi-Fi service provided by the Embassy of Ecuador in London, after notification of this Special Protocol to the asylee. The Embassy will give you the technical details so you can connect, as soon as the service provider has activated it.


17    Mr. Assange will use his own computer and mobile communication device to connect to the internet and make his telephone calls through that channel, in accordance with the provisions of section 


16. All additional communication costs to the wireless internet service of the Embassy, they must be paid by Mr. Julian Assange. The Embassy will not pay for any other form or channel of communication that Mr. Assange wants to use.


18    Except in exceptional cases and only with written authorization from the Head of the Diplomatic Mission, the Embassy may provide the asylee with the use of telephone lines or the Internet service of the Diplomatic Mission, or the use of computers of diplomatic officials.


19    Admission to the Embassy’s headquarters of telephones, mobile phones. tablets, computers and any other electronic device must have prior written authorization from the Head of Mission, who will request the written detail of the brand, model, serial number and telephone number (if applicable) of each of them. The detail of the electronic equipment will be included in the request for visits described in number 2 of this Special Protocol.



20.    The Head of the Diplomatic Mission will denounce for an attack against the security of the Embassy, before the competent British authorities, the person who enters the Embassy with, equipment not declared or not accepted by the Head of the Diplomatic Mission.


21.    Installation of all types of electronic devices, permanent or – temporary, on the premises or on the perimeter of the Embassy as well as the manipulation of electrical and electronic devices in the headquarters of the Embassy must be authorized previously and in writing by the Head of Mission.


22    If Mr. Julian Assange or any of your visitors or associates install or operate unauthorized writing by the Head of the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador, the Government of Ecuador reserves the right to impound through security personnel such equipment or ordering equipment British authorities entering the embassy to seize them if Ecuadorian security personnel could not do it. Additionally, the Embassy made the complaint referred to in section 21 of the Special Protocol.


23.    The Embassy of Ecuador in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Ecuadorian State will not be responsible for the contents of communications, statements, documents, messages through social networks or any other expression of ideas or opinions, by any means, that Mr. Julian Assange performs while he is inside the Diplomatic Mission of Ecuador in London.


24    Mr. Julian Assange is reminded that as long as the Republic of Ecuador recognizes him as an asylee. must, in exercising its right of communication and freedom of expression from the Embassy of Ecuador in London, comply scrupulously with the conventional and customary norms of diplomatic asylum , among others, especially, the prohibition to carry out activities that could be considered as political and interference in the internal affairs of other States, or that may cause harm to the good relations of Ecuador with any other State, whatever form is used to execute said activities.


25    Failure to comply with any of the obligations set forth in the preceding paragraph and in international treaties on diplomatic asylum that is a State Party to Ecuador, as well as other possible consequences, lead to the termination of the asylum of Mr. Julian Assange, in accordance with national and international standards. Such non-compliance may entail. in addition, the immediate disconnection of Internet access provided by the Embassy, for which the Head of the Mission, in consultation with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, will draw up a Special Act .



C. MEDICAL ATTENTION


26    In order to safeguard the health and mental and physical well-being of Mr. Assange, the asylee must undergo quarterly evaluations with medical specialists designated and paid by Mr. Assange himself.


27    The Embassy will coordinate in writing with Mr. Julian Assange the moment in which he must submit to the first quarterly examination and then, every three months, he will remind him to carry out his next appointment. If the asylee refuses to make the quarterly medical evaluation, it will be considered as a serious fault of his obligations as an asylee in the Embassy of Ecuador since that refusal would prevent the Ecuadorian State from guaranteeing an adequate and periodic control of his physical well-being.


28 Mr. Assange may be assisted by medical personnel requested by Mr. Assange, at any time that he requires. To enter the Embassy and attend to Mr. Assange, the medical staff will not require a prior appointment and they will only have to present a professional identification at the door of the Embassy accrediting them as health workers, and to register with the security personnel of the Embassy. . As far as possible and if it is not an emergency medical attention, Mr. Julian Assange should keep the list of his treating doctors updated to facilitate identification and expedite admission to the Embassy.


29    The results of the quarterly evaluations or of medical attention, in general, will only be known by Mr. Assange. The privacy of said data will be protected in accordance with Ecuadorian legislation.


30    In case of medical emergency or at the express request of Mr. Assange, the Head of the Mission will authorize his transfer, as soon as possible, to receive care in specialized medical centers outside the Embassy. For this case, Emergency Protocols A and B will be followed, the texts of which are reproduced at the end of this document, as ANNEX I, which were drafted with the knowledge and consent of Mr. Julian Assange. The contact list of Emergency Protocol B will be updated monthly in coordination with the asylee.


31    The Ecuadorian State shall not be liable for the effects of Mr. Assange’s health conditions that have not been disclosed to the Ecuadorian State, freely and voluntarily and in due time, by Mr. Assange or the physicians who evaluate or treat him.


32    In order to safeguard the health conditions of the premises of the Embassy, Mr. Julian Assange and visitors keep the cleanliness and hygiene of the bathroom and other spaces used within the Embassy. For the same reasons, Mr. Julian Assange will be responsible for the well-being, food, cleanliness and proper care of your pet. If you did not pay attention due to pet, the Head of Mission will request Mr. Assange to deliver the pet to another person or an animal shelter outside the Diplomatic Mission.


In view of budget cuts. the Embassy will not be able to pay any expenses of food, medical care, laundry or other expenses related to the stay of Mr. Julian Assange as of December 1, 2018. The Embassy will only continue paying. from 1 December 2018, the cost of basic services Property: rent, electricity, water, heating, and wireless communications service that stated in this Protocol.


Failure to comply with the obligations contained in this Special Protocol by the asylee may result in the termination of diplomatic asylum by the Ecuadorian State in accordance with relevant international instruments. The Ecuadorian State reserves the right to accept or reject the explanations that Mr. Assange may give in writing regarding the breach of the obligations of this Protocol.


This Special Protocol will become effective upon delivery of a copy, together with an English translation, to Mr. Julian Paul Assange. The Head of the Mission of Ecuador will draw up a Delivery-Reception Act, endorsed by the Consul of Ecuador in London, which will be forwarded to the Foreign Ministry of Ecuador by Quipux.


This Special Protocol may be modified by the Embassy of Ecuador at any time advised by the circumstances. The Chief of the Diplomatic Mission will notify in writing of the changes in the present Protocol to Mr. Julian Assange, which will take effect as soon as said notification occurs.


London, October 11, 2018



ANNEX I


EMERGENCY MEDICAL PROTOCOLS


A and B


EMERGENCY PROTOCOL *


n case of loss of consciousness of Mr. Assange)


I operator according to reports the fact by telephone to the Ipienies people ..


1.         Ambassador


2.         Medical Header


3.         Person of Mr. Assange’s team


yocedirniento for security personnel


*          Call the people who are inside the emergency protocol.


    Allow Mr. Assange to leave only with the prior authorization of the

Ambassador or the Second of Mission, advised by the family doctor of the asylee.


services for Diplomats


Once the call is received, the Ambassador will be mobilized to the diplomatic headquarters to know the medical evaluation and, based on the doctor’s criteria, coordinate the departure of Mr. Julian Assange from the Embassy. The leader of the Diplomatic Mission must maintain permanent contact with the Second Mission, who must also move to the headquarters.

*          The Ambassador will escort Mr. Assange into office until medical authorities permit it.


*          The Ambassador will be responsible for communicating to the authorities in Ecuador about what happened and the actions taken regarding the health of Mr. Assange.



Rrotocoio de – emergencia 13 leuando cioesia el Erribajadorl


The operator/security informs of the fact through the telephone to the si, gu J’entes people,


1.        Second of Mission


2.        A third of Mission (Option 1 and 2)


3.        GP


4.        Person of Mr. Assange’s team


Naced irnientos for security personnel


‘              Call the people who are inside the emergency protocol 41 Allow Mr. Assange to leave only with the authorization, in advance, of the


Ambassador or Charge / a Business, mentored by Leo ~


head of the asylee.


Procedures pa! to D; ornatitos


and            Once the call of the Third Party of Mission has been received (A and 1111), you must go to the Embassy and maintain permanent contact with the Trade Bureau, who must also travel to the headquarters.


*            Once the doctor recommends the evaluation, the Third Party of Mission must communicate the fact to the Second Missionary who authorizes the exit of Mr. Assange_


and            The Third of Mission will accompany Mr. Assange in the Ambulatory until the medical authorities allow it.


The Second Mission is responsible for communicating if:               at 

authorities in Ecuador.

Nata .. This dacuit , trita               lech’izrado aval Ati mastatOnly dir dir Jos penamos Javahricraefias


caltsidefaohlo fas (oí: alarmes               ntovAkInselho inert – thtka ccd fío Em jú               r Eruldlekkr effl tí Reim 

I measure.

This Surge Knight Was At “The Secret Meeting that Changed Rap Music and Destroyed a Generation”


After more than 20 years, I’ve finally decided to tell the world what I witnessed in 1991, which I believe was one of the biggest turning point in popular music, and ultimately American society. I have struggled for a long time weighing the pros and cons of making this story public as I was reluctant to implicate the individuals who were present that day. So I’ve simply decided to leave out names and all the details that may risk my personal well being and that of those who were, like me, dragged into something they weren’t ready for.

Between the late 80’s and early 90’s, I was what you may call a “decision maker” with one of the more established company in the music industry. I came from Europe in the early 80’s and quickly established myself in the business. The industry was different back then. Since technology and media weren’t accessible to people like they are today, the industry had more control over the public and had the means to influence them anyway it wanted. This may explain why in early 1991, I was invited to attend a closed door meeting with a small group of music business insiders to discuss rap music’s new direction. Little did I know that we would be asked to participate in one of the most unethical and destructive business practice I’ve ever seen.

http://www.normschriever.com/blog/dont-believe-the-hype-a-counterpoint-to-the-secret-meeting-that-changed-rap-story

This could finally be the end of the road for the record-label head who, a generation ago, helped bring the West Coast gangsta rap of Dr. Dre, Snoop Dogg and Tupac Shakur to the mainstream, pushing aside the pop rap of artists such as MC Hammer and Tone-Loc and putting low-riders and gang signs into heavy rotation on MTV. In the process, Knight established himself as a legendary music-biz tough guy. His exploits — some mythic, some real — during the heyday of Death Row Records have become part of hip-hop lore: In the early Nineties, he allegedly shook down Vanilla Ice into handing over publishing profits, walking the rapper out to a hotel-room balcony to show him how far his fall would be. (“I needed to wear a diaper that day,” Ice said later.) In his memoir, former N.W.A manager Jerry Heller alleged that Knight and his cohorts, bearing baseball bats, intimidated Eazy-E into releasing Dre from his Ruthless Records contract. (The claims have never been substantiated.) Knight was sitting next to Tupac when he was gunned down in 1996 in Las Vegas; his participation in a fight on the night of the shooting would land him in prison for five years on a probation violation.

 

http://www.hiphopisread.com/2012/04/secret-meeting-that-changed-rap-music.html

Yemen: Tens of Thousands Protest U.S.-Backed, Saudi-Led Offensive on 1st Anniversary | Democracy Now!


In Yemen, tens of thousands took to the streets to protest the U.S.-backed, Saudi-led offensive against Houthi rebels on the first anniversary of the campaign. The protests were said to be the largest in Yemen since the 2011 demonstrations forced the resignation of President Ali Abdullah Saleh. Since the U.S.-backed, Saudi-led intervention began last March, more than 6,200 people have been killed in Yemen, about half of them civilians.

Source: Yemen: Tens of Thousands Protest U.S.-Backed, Saudi-Led Offensive on 1st Anniversary | Democracy Now!

Military Sock Puppets, NSA Trolls & CIA Shills


I was looking up another article and came across this list of articles researching shills and sock puppets.

Ronald Thomas West

This collection is aftermath of my interest in exploring the relationship between Intelligence Agencies & Wikipedia. Primary credit for the following collection of links (which I’ve added to) goes to ‘the internet propagandist’ or an anonymous soul whose page had since disappeared –

Spent time searching the subject of who your facebook friends might be? Ever wonder what the intelligence agencies are up to with fake profiles? Driven mad at people who derail intelligent discussions? It’s simple folks. In information operations, the goal is to create people who ‘are what they think’ to the advantage of ‘the man behind the curtain.’ This collection should help lift the ‘cover’ ..

‘Beware’ the police tool that data mines your life

Smart Phones & Tablets Spying On You

The Gentleperson’s Guide To Forum Spies

Propaganda and Debating Techniques

Disinformation Tactics: The Methods Used To Keep You In The Dark

GCHQ hacks online…

View original post 239 more words

Love Them Or Hate Them


Love them or hate them.

The Federal Police have repeatedly, created a media free zone and then killed.

That’s a reality. It is also the reality that the US has a militarized police with a long-standing trigger habit.

71 people have been killed by US police already in 2016.

Not sure if that includes Mr. Finicum.

1139 Last year.

They are asking for a 3rd party mediator, a witness. (see video)

This is not unreasonable given the state of our nation.

Getting these people out alive should be 1st priority.

They are four people. That have good and just cause to be afraid.

They have not been blind to what’s been happening in cities.

There is cause for fear.

This is one of the best quotes I have seen so far explaining what we are seeing:

This is the way it goes. The Corporate PR got you angry at a whole subset of people. So that, extrajudicial killings were OK, but the ones that were yelling then, “Wait! Wait. This is not OK.”

Will be the one’s cheering your death, now.

Got to mend some bridges.

It is not OK just because they are whitey to say, “Oh see we told you so…” and not help.

Please Help.

Here is ways to reach out to Franklin Graham

https://www.facebook.com/FranklinGraham

https://twitter.com/Franklin_Graham

http://billygraham.org/story/franklin-graham-launching-50-city-tour-in-2016/

https://decisionamericatour.com/about/

This is not an endorsement of Franklin Graham. This is a request to stop what you are doing, contact him, and ask him to mediate. Please, do it now. Share this request.

Analysis of Remarks by SAC Greg Bretzing at a Press Conference to Address the Ongoing Situation at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge


With little fanfare, this is a raw analysis of the press conference that went with the release of Remarks by SAC Greg Bretzing at a Press Conference to Address the Ongoing Situation at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge written statement present by FBI Portland
January 28, 2016

I will make it as easy to digest as possible within time constraints. This is not a polish piece. This is intended only to document in the most immediate fashion. If it warrants being polished this will be the draft it comes from. To use this analysis, please contact me. All rights reserved. This is the intellectual property of the Julia Clark Organization.

The source of the analysis is from shuff1111 of youtube. I do not know him. He only by chance was one of the first to have the Video of the press conference up. What I do find odd is that the press conference was not recorded and posted by any known agency or corporate media. Thank you shuff1111 for your service.

 

This is the Analysis derived: 

I have highlighted or noted points. This is not intended for laymen explanation. Please ask if you need more explanation or are curious about a highlight or note. 

1:10 trips over the word transparency

1:37 trips over the word several

3:42 video stream fails

3:42 says “Shortly the camera will pan back to” the video feed does not pan when it returns.

3:53 the video feed returns.

3:53 He says, “Oh, heads up.”

4:06 He says, “The camera is panning back to the jeep at this point.”

12:52 He states Oregon State Troupers were the ones that fired the weapons.

13:43 He uses “Umm” and tightened lips and sucked them inward

13:44 Shakes his head in a no fashion

13:47 He says, “That law enforcement showed great restraint while holding his hand in front of him in a barrier type way

13:50 He says “Then when the vehicle, then took off.” his voice quivers

13:51 Uses ‘Ummm”

13:52 He says, “you could see that it just about seriously injured, ahh, a law enforcement officer.”

13:53 a micro head shake

13:58 he says, “as its, as it barrels toward”

14:01 he says, “And that umm” pursed his lips together

14:06 He says, “based on the deadly force policy of the FBI and OSP Umm ahh that “

14:06 and extended blink

14:17 Uses “Umm” then says “as you can see afterwards and as I explained in the video, those pops and sounds that umm. Of course, there is no sounds in the video.”

14:28 He says, “flash bangs, ahh, sponge projectiles that pierce the window and oc gas

14:44 shakes head

14:44 He says “all occupants in the jeep surrendered without incident” shakes head again

14:50 He says “ahh with no violence”

15:00 smiles

15:06 Purse and smacks lips, their latest.

16:48 Serious look, looks, down and to the right, takes a deep breath uses “Umm” 3 times while explaining

18:23 He is asked if this is a stop for a traffic violation. The question clearly amuses him. He first clearly states, “no.” then says, “Not that I’m. Well, then. You know what, I don’t know, there might have been” takes a ha, “that was not the purpose of the call err the stop”

  • This is troubling. He clearly and jovially changes the case file to fit his theory. He says,”No.” firmly, then catches himself. Dismisses himself and stops that dismissal midsentence. then moves to the willing chair with the statement, “well, then”, and  makes a choice to fudge the records with the justification, “You know what” statement, then proceeds to change the record.
  • However, his utterance and mistaken word of using call instead of stop. Highly suggests that  that the call the Bundy’s had hours before from the FBI negotiator was also a fabrication and not in good faith.

 

18:29 He takes a question about distance. He says that he “You know, the exact distance, I can’t tell you. That’s why we actually show you the video. You can tell that a period of time went by and that they were traveling at a high rate of speed. Umm. He purses lips and licks them. “And they had plenty of. And again they were, they were stopped for well over four minutes. And then they chose.. as I said two nights ago or last night.” smacks lips, “Actions have consequences”

19:19 stumbles over the word truck, using car instead and correcting himself.

19:23 he says, “And is currently in our custody, umm” then purse lips

19:34 he says, “But umm as the video clearly shows”

Screenshots of questionable moments.

These are points noted while watching of questionable moments.

LaVoy

This is not inclusive of all points of analysis.

JC

 

 

Reject #OpIsis and the Co-Opting of Anonymous | Courage Hammond


The attacks in France were a terrible but unfortunately predictable response by desperate people who, after a decade of war and occupation, want the west to taste what we have been regularly dishing out. But we cannot allow them to be used to justify more war.

It’s a familiar script,

used to push police-state laws, mass surveillance, and rampant militarization. It was never about fighting terrorism or weapons of mass destruction, but about [corporate conglomerate control]*

The naïve fools behind the operation are being manipulated by intelligence [contractors]* taking advantage of the emotional reaction

The same intelligence industry that runs their own NSA hacker operations against ISIS uses the same counter-terrorism justification to spy on everyday civilians with no regards for rights to privacy, encryption, or anonymity. They have always targeted Anonymous and other dissident groups as terrorists, and when they aren’t trying to discredit or imprison us, they are attempting to co-opt us

Sabu [personna]* asked me to hack government websites of Syria and Turkey, among others, which I did, unaware [it]* was an FBI [rogue operation]*.

The [contractors]* out there encouraging you to “hack the terrorists” will have no problem turning around and locking you up for years if you are not useful to their agenda.

*Editorial correction

 

Source: Reject #OpIsis and the Co-Opting of Anonymous | Courage Hammond

Spooks’ view on Syria: what wikileaks revealed | Alex Thomson’s View


‘Syria makes Libya look like a piece of cake’

Source: Spooks’ view on Syria: what wikileaks revealed | Alex Thomson’s View

 

I recall that time period. I kept getting IM can you tell us any idea, anything about who is the good guy and who is the bad guy in Syria. I was staunchly against any assistance to the Syria Uprising. As mentioned previously the Culling Corruption Campaign was not to go to Syria  and by that time Syria had moved way out of my knowledge ring. However, during this time period, kept getting repeated requests to help identify the bad guys from the good guys.

Maybe, they should have thought to perk my interest.

Roseburg Strong


Sometimes, I forget this blog in and post on social media.

Lots of reason, or better called excuses:

I get busy.

I am feeling a bit shattered. Sometimes this seems cumbersome.

Recently, I traveled through Roseburg. Just a week or so before the tragic October 1st I met the people. I visited the community outreach center. I encouraged University as a means to an ends.

It is a nice town with great people.

I recall a conversations I had with ladies, how hospitable and  nice everyone was. Roseburg is so small and so remote that wild Turkeys are a common sight within the urban setting. I love Roseburg.  One lady and I even talked about me staying. I had just came from Medford, which is close to Klamath County where the officers had blue lined their chief for beating a prisoner.

It has all been so too much. So surreal. I traveled on planning to make the loop back across the mountains to Crescent City farther north. I was hoping for an easier pass.

Then the shooting.

I was in Douglas County when the shootings happened.  It is tragic

This community is a good community. It is very tight-knit. It is very caring.

I saw a post that truly fits the feelings in this area. This area is very remote, every town is connected in some way in a very intricate support system . Are there problems back here? Yea, there are huge problems back here. But together the community lives. And you have to really understand that:  Together the community lives. Say that again out loud to yourself:

Together the community lives.

I have heard not a single bad word about the shooter’s Mother. Think about that. Of all people who should be scorned now, or that is left to be scorned from the Shooter, the community is not scorning her. This is a noble community. I am sorry the shooter fell into what ever rabbit hole he fell into. I think we all are. However, tragic the picture is, the fortitude this community has is noble. Together this community lives. Together WE.ARE

WE ARE

Prayer request and call to action from Terry Lee Reid

Analysis of Assange, Anna, and Sofia’s Statements


Today, it was noted on one of our timelines this article

http://www.peterkofod.dk/assange-the-sex-allegations/

Though course and choppy language, the article did have links to the leaks testaments of Assange, Anna, and Sofia

It also was noted on one of our posts from three years ago, we made a successful imploration on behalf of the work Assange was tasked with via the Manning Files. In that light, an analysis of the statements is made.

http://rixstep.com/1/20110204,04.shtml

http://rixstep.com/1/20110131,00.shtml

http://rixstep.com/1/20110204,02.shtml

http://rixstep.com/1/20110130,01.shtml

Even given the minor and major signs of deceit and misgivings by the two other subjects. The one that stands out is

Anna notices after a while that Assange withdraws from her to fix the condom. Judging from the sound, it sounded to Anna like Assange took the condom off. He entered her again and continued the act. Anna again checked his penis with her hand and again felt the edge of the condom where it should be and so let the sex continue.

Anna says she already heard from several sources that Assange ‘chases all women who cross his path’.

Anna is convinced that Assange, when he withdrew from her the first time, deliberately broke the condom at the tip and thereafter continued the sex with the resulting ejaculation. In answer to a question Anna says she didn’t look closer at the condom, if it was broken as she thought, but she says she thinks she still has the condom at home and will look at it. She says that even the bed sheets used on that occasion are most likely still in her hamper.

Many people have had a rubber naturally break. The size of the hole created in an object, ie condom, created to fit snugly an object, ie a penis, creates a noticeable hole.

The fact the female subject did not inspect the condom, according to here statement “she thinks she still has it,” to see if she is safe from STDs or unwanted pregnancy and thus solving the mystery of exposure or not; suggests this was not a major concern.

However, within a certain subgroup of élite hackers, which the principles are unknown. there is a rape culture where details, tips, and tricks are exchange. Information and comradery are exchanged to the point that the members could be considered cohorts. The description of the nature and style resembles a principle from that group of cohorts. It is possible that a tip or trick could have been exchanged that would obscure condom breakage from casual observation.

In conclusion, without the full interviews and interrogations,  analysis is speculative.

It is possible that Assange was monitored for exploitable sexual behavior patterns, before this incident. It is also possible that it was “perfect storm” of inevitability.

What is remarkable is the behavior of the Sweden Judaical Officers.  It is their behavior pattern(s) that cast a strong doubt on the incident.

Was Julian Assange simply an gauche promiscuous person? Had he corhorted with elite hacker subgroup that exchanged stories, tips, and ideas? Had both of the women engaged in a honey pot? Had one of the women engaged in a honey pot? Were either or both of these women hired by one or more individuals of the sub-group, or part of the subgroup?

With no other women coming forward to collaborate Assange’s sexual behavior patterns or to deny the behavior patterns it is difficult  to asseverate Assange’s promiscuity or lack of previous promiscuity by Assange, save this one incident.

Lakota Situation Summary for the Rainbow Family


THE LAKOTA PEOPLE AND THE BLACK HILLS:  A SITUATION SUMMARY FOR THE RAINBOW FAMILY

This educational document was requested by members of the Rainbow Family to share among those who are not understanding of the situation in the Black Hills and with the Lakota Oyate.

THE LAKOTA HAVE JURISDICTION

The matriarchal Tetuwan Lakota Oyate have never relinquished nation status. The assertion of sovereign Lakota political, economic, and cultural identity within our territory has been continually maintained through our matriarchal system and other customary political and cultural institutions like treaty and judicial councils, elder societies, and warrior societies. This is the real Lakota.

The Lakota People have the right to assert independent status and sovereign jurisdiction over our territory under International Law such as the 1961 and 1969 Vienna Convention on Treaties, 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 2007 Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and in U.S. law under…

View original post 651 more words

Good Grief


policecommander

The painful privilege of policing is to see all of life – in all its vivid, unedited extremes.

And, after any length of time in this line of work, there might be a danger that you start to lose the capacity to be shocked; that having seen and heard so much, you somehow become immune to it all.

But that just can’t be so – and working life continues to throw up circumstances that leave you almost speechless.

A couple of years back – during my time as Southwark Borough Commander – local officers responded to allegations of a serious sexual assault on a teenage boy. He had been confronted by a suspect armed with a knife, demanding his mobile. On discovering that he had no phone, the assailant then forced him into the stairwell of a nearby block of flats. And raped him.

It happened in a public space…

View original post 498 more words

California is flush with cash. So why the warnings to prepare for recession? – LA Times


I went to Eurka, CA for the past two days.  Partly for a gig and to check out the town.

One of the ways I judge a town is by its library. The same way I judge a restaurant by its bathroom, I judge a town by its library.

I parked by Starbucks and walked the many blocks to the Library.

To tell this story I cannot do it in order, because it was a bit of a epiphany moment.

The library in Eureka. CA does not open until 10AM. That is very late opening for a library.  The thing is I noticed that the Library in Crescent City also open a late 10AM.

I was a bit shocked that I had just walked so far and the Library was closed. I was telling no one in general how appalling it is that the library was closed at such a late time in the morning. And noticing this very strikingly beautiful homeless chick grabbing a paper to read on the steps. Rolling her eyes and giving a manufactured surprised look as if to warn me to not speak up.   Then this guy pops his head out of a thin wooden door to blow his nose right there where I stood! Now I am shocked and appalled. I ask him the time and tell him to not blow his nose right there on me He became uppity and asked. “Don’t you have a phone?” then said, “I did not blow my nose on you, I blew it in this tissue!” Well, I explained that polite children blow their nose in the bathroom, not in close proximity to someones face  That I had five phones and I asked him for the time, moreover that late opening libraries are a poor reflection on a city and I judge cities on their libraries. His guilt was snappily  retorted, “Don’t judge a book by its cover! It’s 9:15.” and briskly retreated behind the door shutting the door with more force than necessary.

I knew he could still hear me and explained in the modern world designers work hard on the covers and one does and can judge a book by its cover! Moreover, having an elaborate Gentleman’s Club right next to the Library, while the Library languishes, just will not do for me!

Let me tell you about the Gentleman’s Club. 

The name of the club is the Ingomar Club. When I asked about it before visiting the library I was told it was a gentleman’s club. Well, I knew there is not enough money, nor enough fancy women here to sustain a gentleman’s club ie a strip joint! So they meant a men’s only club. A club that allows men of certain criteria to cohort together. In this case, it is the meager wealthy of Humboldt and surrounding areas for the most part I say meager wealth because I have worked in security services at the Augusta National.

California is flush with cash. So why the warnings to prepare for recession? - LA Times

It is no less ostentatious, due to the fact that the Augusta National pays minimum wages and does not pay staff during their golf tourney.

Here is the Ingomar Club’s tax filings for 2004- 2012. As shown they are far far from wealthy or elite. Yet, they maintain this self-made shrine to ostentatious wealthy elitism.  while the infrastructure and society crumbles around them.

Moreover, a horrid pissing on the grave of the very man who had the mansion built   Though erased from the historical account is the a humble detail shared with me from a local, be it myth or legend, how Mr. Carson built the structure during an economic down-turn so he could employ and keep his workers during an economic down-turn.

In other words, a community project to benefit the community. This story of the Carson Mansion is reinforced by the lack of plans and the whimsical mismatched nature of the mansion.

Please do not mistake my thrashing for disdain. Maintaining such a lovely blue-collar work of art is honorable. Though a lot less delusion would make it wholesome.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

California is flush with cash. So why the warnings to prepare for recession? – LA Times.

Research


I received this email in my spam folder. I googled the return to address and it lead to http://www.mail-archive.com/1821317384@qq.com/

Delivered-To: []@gmail.com

Received: by 10.43.116.196 with SMTP id fj4csp569116icc;

Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:24:36 -0700 (PDT)

X-Received: by 10.50.122.106 with SMTP id lr10mr7858137igb.32.1414531474482;

Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:24:34 -0700 (PDT)

Return-Path:

Received: from v157-7-64-227.z1d9.static.cnode.jp (v157-7-64-227.z1d9.static.cnode.jp. [157.7.64.227])

by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qj2si4303448igc.39.2014.10.28.14.24.34

for

(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);

Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:24:34 -0700 (PDT)

Received-SPF: none (google.com: bodyways@v157-7-64-227.z1d9.static.cnode.jp does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=157.7.64.227;

Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;

spf=neutral (google.com: bodyways@v157-7-64-227.z1d9.static.cnode.jp does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=bodyways@v157-7-64-227.z1d9.static.cnode.jp

Received: from bodyways by v157-7-64-227.z1d9.static.cnode.jp with local (Exim 4.82)

(envelope-from )

id 1XjEFj-0000ai-0w

for []@gmail.com; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 06:24:31 +0900

To: []@gmail.com

Subject: Hello

From: Ms. Gu Kailai

Reply-To: 1821317384@qq.com

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Message-Id:

Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 06:24:31 +0900

X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report

X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname – v157-7-64-227.z1d9.static.cnode.jp

X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain – gmail.com

X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID – [501 512] / [47 12]

X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain – v157-7-64-227.z1d9.static.cnode.jp

X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: v157-7-64-227.z1d9.static.cnode.jp: authenticated_id: bodyways/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed

Hello,

I want to make a Donation, please reply to this email for Details.

Ms. Gu

via .

“Make Arrests, Issue Tickets or Get Fired” Missouri Police Caught in Disgusting Quota Scheme | The Free Thought Project


It truly forces police officers to create criminals out of otherwise innocent people in order to generate revenue, or they face losing their jobs.

But hey, like St. Clair said, he’s got a family to feed. So he’s “just doing his job” when he throws you in a prison cell over a seat belt “violation.”

It wouldn’t be nearly as disheartening if the Bellefontaine Neighbors police department was some rogue unit and this was an isolated incident. But sadly it is not. There are entirely too many examples.

The most recent happened in November of last year. The Free Thought Project reported the story of police in Normal, IL. Several cops from the Normal police department sued the city claiming that the department’s policy forced them to make arrests without probable cause.

After showing how difficult it can be to blow the whistle on corruption in one’s own unit, it’s safe to assume that there are departments across the nation with equally despicable extortion rackets in place.

via “Make Arrests, Issue Tickets or Get Fired” Missouri Police Caught in Disgusting Quota Scheme | The Free Thought Project.

“Fuck #Anonymous, I’m at Spa Castle,” New Vine of Hector “Sabu” Monsegur Generates Outrage | The Cryptosphere


Hate clicks are just as bankable as love clicks, and might be more predictable.

A perfect example of this is former Vice journalist Dan Stuckey’s newest Vine, featuring legendary snitch Sabu, aka Hector X. Monsegur, the Daily Dot’s newest reviewer. It features Monsegur and Stuckey soaking apparently naked in a tub together.

“I’m with Dan Stuckey. Fuck Anonymous. We’re at fuckin’ Spa Castle. Expect my review soon, bitches!”

You might remember Stuckey as the former @YourAnonNews contributor

via “Fuck #Anonymous, I’m at Spa Castle,” New Vine of Hector “Sabu” Monsegur Generates Outrage | The Cryptosphere.

Reprints: #FuckSabu and Here’s Why | The Cryptosphere


Reprints: #FuckSabu and Here’s Why

BY RAINCOASTER on MARCH 11, 2015 • ( 2 )

This is a reprint from my personal blog from two years ago. If you’ve been following the #OpDDD story so far, you’ll know why it’s a timely read. At the time it was written, we didn’t yet know that the deal he’d made with the FBI in fact did not allow him to maintain custody of the children. Now that he’s doing the media circuit claiming that he “did it for the kids” it’s time to review some hard truths about Hector Xavier Monsegur, aka Sabu.

via Reprints: #FuckSabu and Here’s Why | The Cryptosphere.